Abstract

Substance abuse treatment programmes depend on boundary spanning to identify opportunities and threats, and represent their interests to stakeholders such as licensing entities and regulators. This study sought to identify director, client, unit and market factors associated with active director boundary spanning. Using data from the 1995, 1999-2000 and 2005 waves of a national survey of outpatient substance abuse treatment units, generalized estimating equation regression models tested associations between predictors and five aspects of directors' self-reported boundary spanning. Directors licensed as substance abuse treatment counsellors spent more time than average consulting with other treatment providers and making presentations in the community. Older directors spent less time consulting with other treatment providers, making community presentations and liaisoning with monitoring organizations. The few associations between client unemployment and director boundary spanning were positive; the two associations between the percentage of clients who were African-American and boundary spanning were negative. Private ownership and being based in larger organizations were negatively associated with some types of boundary spanning. Perceived competition for public support was positively associated with all measures of boundary spanning. Directors of treatment organizations may improve treatment practices and political leverage by directly, but selectively, interacting with key external stakeholders.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call