Abstract
Governance for centralized organizational structures has long roots and well-developed frameworks, including for various specialty areas, such as IT or data governance. However, the introduction of blockchain technology as a supportive tool for implementing decentralized organizations requires a renewed focus for research in the area. The paper utilizes empirical data from blockchain ecosystems in the form of white papers (public communique of intention) to analyze their governance intentions. The empirical findings are based on a review of 241 blockchains and distributed ledger technology white papers, out of which 67 include explicit descriptions of how governance should be organized in the ecosystem. Our empirical research distinguishes between three categories of governance: objectives, mechanisms, and stakeholders. We further identify 28 features for these categories, which are described in an open encoding format. Hence, the paper contributes to the emerging blockchain research field, particularly to the decentralized aspects of blockchain governance research. This research also reveals that blockchain governance does not receive the attention it should as a large majority of ecosystems have not disclosed their governance intentions. The results can be utilized as a framework for future research. The results can also be helpful for industry when designing and developing governance systems.
Highlights
A blockchain is essentially a cryptographically secured record-keeping system (Nakamoto 2008)
How are blockchain ecosystems governed according to white papers?
Our findings show that blockchain governance is significantly different in nature from many other forms of governance
Summary
A blockchain is essentially a cryptographically secured record-keeping system (Nakamoto 2008). It is a distributed ledger that promises an immutable record of all transactions that have taken place across a peer-to-peer network. Blockchain, a technology part of a family classified as distributed ledger technology (DLT), assists in securing communication and commoditizing data processing by facilitating distributed edge clouds (Westerlund and Kratzke 2018). The technology includes four key features: 1) transparency, 2) redundancy, 3) immutability, and 4) disintermediation Disintermediation aims to decrease transaction costs and risks associated with the presence of trusted intermediaries. We show later that disintermediation may create new kinds of intermediaries as a result of a deeper implementation of blockchain technologies in the social fabric
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.