Abstract

AbstractNew star‐shaped non‐fullerene acceptors (5Z,5′Z,5′′Z)‐5,5′,5′′‐((benzo[1,2‐b : 3,4‐b′ : 5,6‐b′′]trithiophene‐2,5,8‐triyltris(4‐octylthiophene‐5,2‐diyl))tris(methaneylylidene))tris(3‐octyl‐2‐thioxothiazolidin‐4‐one) (1: BTT‐OT‐ORD) and 2,2′,2′′‐((5Z,5′Z,5′′Z)‐((benzo[1,2‐b : 3,4‐b′ : 5,6‐b′′]trithiophene‐2,5,8‐triyltris(4‐octylthiophene‐5,2‐diyl))tris(methaneylylidene))tris(3‐octyl‐4‐oxothiazolidine‐5,2‐diylidene))trimalononitrile (2: BTT‐OT‐OTZDM) with a benzotrithiophene core, alkyl‐thiophen units, and acceptor units were designed and synthesized. The HOMO‐LUMO levels of 1 and 2 were determined by photoemission spectroscopy and UV‐Vis absorption spectroscopy. Binary blend and ternary blend bulk heterojunction (BHJ) organic solar cells with non‐fullerene acceptors 1 and 2 were fabricated with the inverted device structures of glass/ITO/ZnO/active_layer/MoO3/Ag. Both binary blend BHJ solar cells with 1 and 2 show lower JSC and larger VOC values than P3HT : PCBM solar cells. On the other hand, ternary blend BHJ organic solar cells, including 10 % of 1, exhibited a larger power conversion efficiency than P3HT : PCBM solar cells because the JSC value was largely improved.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call