Abstract

In a seminal essay titled “Vernacular Photographies,” first published in 2000, the photography scholar Geoffrey Batchen calls for us to “restore photography to its own history.”1 Too often, photography has been the square peg forced into the round hole of an art-historical discourse grounded in painting, its visual structures and aesthetics. To better understand photography as an idea, a visual medium, and a concrete visual practice on its own terms, we need to better interrogate the breadth and complexity of the visual objects we call photographs. In particular, Batchen calls attention to the pervasive but remarkably understudied category of photography he describes as “ordinary photographs, the ones made or bought … by everyday folk from 1839 until now, the photographs that preoccupy the home and the heart but rarely the museum or the academy.”

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.