Abstract
In decision analysis, if the criterion is an ordinal rather than a cardinal one, a preferential solution depends on the inter-rater agreement. The Kendall coefficient of concordance W, the Friedman ranks statistic F r , and the Page L statistic are often used to determine the association among M sets of rankings. However, they may get some anomalies because they all use the cardinal variable "variance" to judge the association. In order to correct the anomalies, we use the modified Hopfield neural network instead to determine the association among M sets of rankings. The results are not only to reduce the unidentified cases but also to solve the anomalies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
