Ordinal optimization through multi-objective reformulation

Abstract

We analyze combinatorial optimization problems with ordinal, i.e., non-additive, objective functions that assign categories (like good, medium and bad) rather than cost coefficients to the elements of feasible solutions. We review different optimality concepts for ordinal optimization problems and discuss their similarities and differences. We then focus on two prevalent optimality concepts that are shown to be equivalent. Our main focus lies on the investigation of a bijective linear transformation that transforms ordinal optimization problems to associated standard multi-objective optimization problems with binary cost coefficients. Since this transformation preserves all properties of the underlying problem, problem-specific solution methods remain applicable. A prominent example is dynamic programming and Bellman’s principle of optimality, that can be applied, e.g., to ordinal shortest path and ordinal knapsack problems. We investigate the interrelation between scalarization techniques and methods based on the hypervolume indicator when applied to the ordinal and the transformed problem, respectively. Furthermore, we extend our results to multi-objective optimization problems that combine ordinal and real-valued objective functions.