Abstract
This article explores the relationship between changes in governing and the significance of lifelong learning for this. Drawing on Foucault's notions of governmentality and technologies of the self, and concepts derived from actor-network theory, I argue that discourses of lifelong learning act as intellectual technologies through which there is the attempt to fashion certain networks and order socialities. In the process of representing and mobilising lifelong learning new orderings for the conduct of conduct are produced, which provide possibilities for subjectivity in alignment with a moral economy of enterprise, in which the self becomes something to work on. I also point to the fragility of such actor-networks as the processes of representation become more diffuse and subject to (dis)orders. Theoretically, the paper is attempting to work beyond the binaries of subject-object, nature-society, structure-agency. Its concern is with the socio-rhetorical work in the intellectual technologies with which we engage in and around lifelong learning and the exercises of power at a distance that are involved in the discursive work of the notion of lifelong learning itself.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.