Abstract

Sequence learning effects in simple perceptual and motor tasks are largely unaffected by normal aging. However, less is known about sequence learning in more complex cognitive tasks that involve attention and memory processes and how this changes with age. In this study, we examined whether incidental and intentional sequence learning would facilitate hybrid visual and memory search in younger and older adults. Observers performed a hybrid search task, in which they memorized four or 16 target objects and searched for any of those target objects in displays with four or 16 objects. The memorized targets appeared either in a repeating sequential order or in random order. In the first experiment, observers were not told about the sequence before the experiment. Only a subset of younger adults and none of the older adults incidentally learned the sequence. The “learners” acquired explicit knowledge about the sequence and searched faster in the sequence compared to random condition. In the second experiment, observers were told about the sequence before the search task. Both younger and older adults searched faster in sequence blocks than random blocks. Older adults, however, showed this sequence-learning effect only in blocks with smaller target sets. Our findings indicate that explicit sequence knowledge can facilitate hybrid search, as it allows observers to predict the next target and restrict their visual and memory search. In older age, the sequence-learning effect is constrained by load, presumably due to age-related decline in executive functions.

Highlights

  • Thoughts and actions are often organized in sequences (Ashe et al, 2006; Lashley, 1951; Zacks & Tversky, 2001)

  • The original serial response-time task (SRTT) introduced by Nissen and Bullemer (1987) is a four-choice reaction-time task, in which observers respond to a visual cue that appears at any one of four positions with a corresponding button press

  • The Bayes factor (BF) indicated some evidence for the effect of Target Order (BF10=3.73), but not for any further interactions including the factor

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Thoughts and actions are often organized in sequences (Ashe et al, 2006; Lashley, 1951; Zacks & Tversky, 2001). While there was evidence of general age-related slowing, we demonstrated similar RT × set size functions for younger and older adults: The relative costs of adding distractors to the display and adding targets to the memory set were similar for both age groups (Wiegand & Wolfe, 2020), even up to high set sizes (64 items; Wiegand et al, 2019) This suggests no qualitative age differences in processing in the standard task version, where targets from the memory set appear in random order across trials. If sequence learning is supported by explicit knowledge about the target sequence, one could expect an age-related reduction in the sequence effect due to impaired acquisition of explicit knowledge and executive control of memory retrieval in older compared to younger adults. An explicit representation of the four-target sequence might be acquired more than of the 16-target sequence, and this load effect might be more pronounced in older than younger age

Participants
Experimental procedure
Results and discussion
Limitations and future directions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call