Abstract

Developing and orchestrating classroom discourse about students’ different solution methods is an essential yet complex task for mathematics teachers. This study reports on the first stages of classroom discourse development of one Dutch higher secondary school mathematics teacher who had no prior experience in including classroom discourse in her teaching practice. Four lessons in analytic geometry were developed iteratively, in collaboration with the teacher. The lessons consisted of students working on a mathematical problem plus classroom discourse concerning students’ different solution methods. Classroom discourse video recordings were collected and analyzed in order to develop a framework to characterize the teacher’s actions, and to describe the change in the teacher’s role in classroom discourse. The results reveal three main changes in the teacher’s role: First, the way the teacher reacted to correct or incorrect solution methods shifted from confirming or setting aside suggestions, toward making the solution methods the subject of discussion; second, the distribution of turns changed such that more students were involved in the discourse and in reacting to each other’s solution methods; third, the teacher’s actions shifted from convergent, teacher-led actions toward divergent, student-led actions. These results show that within four lessons, an important step has been taken toward establishing a discourse community.

Highlights

  • In mathematics education, students should learn to think mathematically

  • Based upon previous research (Drageset 2015; Henning et al 2012) and our collected data, we developed a framework for analyzing teacher actions during classroom discourse, and this framework was in turn used to describe changes in the teacher’s role in classroom discourse throughout the four lessons

  • We developed a framework for describing the teacher’s actions during classroom discourse about variations in solution methods (Tables 1 and 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This involves more than merely being able to solve routine tasks. Polya (1957) states that a teacher should not drill students in routine operations, but rather assign them appropriate problems and help them to solve those problems. For most mathematical problems and tasks, several different solution methods are possible; whenever a group of students is confronted with a mathematical problem, students have differing ideas and find various solution methods. This requires that teachers shape their lessons such that

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.