Abstract
We have underestimated completely the processes taking place in Poland, Hungary and especially recently in East Germany, and their and on our society.1-Milos JakesDeposed Czechoslovak leaderNovember 25, 1989IntroductionThis article broadly traces a specific aspect of the transnational effect and influence (in Jake.'s words) of the processes of liberation in the past half-century in central and eastern Europe. It explores the origin of the transnational networks, their interactions behind the Iron Curtain, their zenith in 1989 through 1991, reappearance in the partially reformed postcommunist space, and ends with their latest activities, before outlining a few generalizations in search of a theory for their origins and motivation. Undoubtedly, the contagion from abroad is but one in the constellation of factors (mostly domestic) that make these liberations possible.2 And within this factor, the transnational networks are also but one element. This article will focus on this specific aspect-the main people that transcended borders to reach out to other people.Because the numerous individuals and groups that have organized to overthrow and neocommunist regimes have a multiplicity of ideologies and goals-from liberal to patriotic to anarchist to religious to social-democratic to reformed-communist to simply outraged citizens-for simplicity, and despite its recent discomfiture, the label to describe them collectively is used for this article. Besides Ukraine's event in late 2004, orange has been used by several opposition forces in the region, the most evident being Poland's Orange Alternative as well as Hungary's Orange Appeal and the journal Magyar narancs (Hungarian Orange).Similarly, because the regimes targeted by the people also span different categorizations- from to pseudo-fascist to corrupt neocommunist to sultanistic to ultra-etatist to simply illiberal-in this article also continue with an earlier hypothesis that the nature of such regimes cannot be easily defined by ideology or any well-constructed system of values. Their common denominator instead is a compulsion to engage in illiberal and behavior, perhaps carried over from a combination of Marxist-Leninist ideology and self-selection to and training in their respective nomenklatury. Not all Communist Party members engaged in behavior and some were quite constructive to the reform process and human rights (in fact, regime moderates who played key liberating roles are also defined as people here). It is also true that, with few known exceptions, the key individuals conforming the regimes were either communists or had actively participated in activities from within the apparat even after the liberalizing trends began. Such individuals change ideology and political orientations quite rapidly (the most common venue is from to either ultra-nationalist or unideological corrupt net-works), use the label antisocial to describe the nature of such individuals and their regimes rather than communist or other labels, because it captures their collective essence in one word. The American Psychiatric Association defines as:fail[ure] to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behavior . . . such as destroying property, harassing others, stealing or pursuing illegal occupations. Persons with this disorder disregard the wishes, rights or feelings of others. They are frequently deceitful and manipulative in order to gain personal profit or pleasure. . . . They may repeatedly lie, use an alias, con others, or malinger. . . . They may have an arrogant and inflated self-appraisal and may be excessively opinionated, self-assured and cocky [yet] may display a glib, superficial charm and can be quite voluble and verbally facile.3Vaclav Havel captured the essence of the nonideological struggle between people and antisocials, while reflecting on the Velvet Revolution ten years later: I wouldn't answer that it was the victory of one ideology over another, of one state over another state. …
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.