Oral vinorelbine as a fixed-weekly schedule in taxanes-refractory advanced HRPC: A single institution experience

Abstract

e16084 Background: Vinorelbine (VRL) has been shown to be active in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Oral formulation of VRL represents a significant advance in the treatment of advanced cancer. The recommended doses are 60–80 mg/m2(d1–8 q3wks).We evaluated efficacy and toxicity of different VRL schedule administered as a fixed-weekly dose of 60 mg/m2. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the toxicity profile and efficacy of this schedule in terms of PSA response, objective response and clinical benefit (CB) response. Methods: Pts characteristics were: PS 0–2, adequate bone marrow, liver and renal functions. Oral VRL was adminestered at weekly dose of 60 mg/m2 until disease progression/intolerable toxicity. PSA response was defined as a >50% fall in PSA from baseline, confirmed by a second PSA value 4 or > weeks later. Pts with measurable soft tissue disease met traditional guidelines for tumour responses. Progression was defined by objective disease progression or PSA increase of >50% above nadir or >25% above baseline. Pts were monitored clinically and with serial PSA measurements every 1 week. Results: Thirty seven pts with progressive HR metastatic prostate cancer were evaluated. Mean (range) age was 67 years (50–88), median PSA level was 90 ng/ml (1- 4314), and median Gleason score was 7 (6–9). 23 (62%) pts had previous taxane chemotherapy and 14 pts (38%) were chemo-naive. Pts received a mean of 5.5 cycles (1cycle=3wks) (range:1–24). Median follow-up was 12 months. Thirty three of 37 Pts (97%) achieved a decline in serum PSA. CB response was achieved in 15 out of 37 pts(40%). The PSA response was observed in 13 pts (35%). Objective response was not observed and only 6 pts showed SD (16%). The relative dose-intensity was 94%. There were no reported grade 3–4 toxicities. Only 1 treatment discontinuation was observed (esopahgitis g2). Toxicities consisted primarily of g2 anemia (25%) and mild nausea (32%). Conclusions: Oral Vinorelbine administered as a fixed-weekly schedule of 60 mg/m2 is a safe regimen in pts with advanced HRPC. This regimen of oral vinorelbine is an effective and well-tolerated treatment in this setting, despite a major dose-intensity administered. Further studies will be evaluated in chemo-naive and/or elderly population. No significant financial relationships to disclose.