Abstract

We prospectively evaluated thalidomide, an oral agent with antiangiogenic and immunomodulatory properties, in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, comparing the drug to standard intravenous chemotherapy and treatment holiday in terms of both progression-free interval and quality of life. Eligible patients had recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer and had received a minimum of two prior therapeutic regimens. Patients were offered one of three arms: (Arm A) any standard intravenous single-agent chemotherapy; (Arm B) oral thalidomide 200 mg daily; (Arm C) treatment holiday. Computed tomography (CT) scans were performed every two cycles until disease progression by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. CA-125 was measured monthly as was quality of life using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-O) questionnaire. Forty patients participated: 18 on Arm A; 18 on Arm B; and 4 on Arm C. The groups were comparable in terms of number of prior regimens and cycles of chemotherapy. The progression- free intervals were similar in Arm A and Arm B (3.7 versus 3.8 months). The PR/SD rate was 6.7%/60% for Arm A, and 7.7%/53.8% in Arm B. Of those treated with thalidomide, 53% had a drop in CA-125 greater than 50%, compared to 13% receiving intravenous chemotherapy. FACT-O scores at baseline and throughout treatment were equivalent. The oral chemotherapeutic agent thalidomide appears to be comparable in response and quality of life, compared to single agent intravenous chemotherapy, in our population of heavily pretreated patients with ovarian cancer.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.