ORAL IRON VERSUS PARENTERAL IRON SUCROSE IN A RURAL TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL OF SOUTHERN INDIA

Abstract

Introduction: Nutritional iron deciency is one of the most common deciency disorders affecting more than one billion people, with pregnant women at particular risk. In pregnancy iron decit attributable due to increased iron demand of the feto-placental unit and an increase in maternal red cell mass. 30% of anaemic women have haemoglobin levels below 10g/dl above 10% below 8g/dl. Irrespective of mode of delivery blood loss can also be a contributing factor postnatal. Oral iron therapy and intravenous iron sucrose are the main therapy of iron deciency anaemia. The present study is aimed at comparing both their efcacy side effects. METHOD : Aprospective randomised control study was done from June 2019- September 2020, in the department of Obstetrics and gynaecology, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Science, BG nagara. 253 women including antenatal women between 8-38 weeks gestational age were studied and postnatal women studied with no associated obstetrics and medical complication. They were divided into Group A (Oral) and Group B(Intravenous) by randomization. The two groups were monitored clinically, and for an improvement in laboratory parameters after four weeks on day 30 haemoglobin and haematocrit were repeated in both the groups. This study results were expressed as mean +/- standard deviation. And to test the signicance of difference between Oral and IVmode of treatment, student Ttest was done to verify the statistical signicance. RESULTS: Out of 253 patients in the study the mean age of ANC patients was 24.7+/- 4.4years. Mean age of PNC patients was 24.15+/- 3.5years. The peripheral smear showed Dimorphic anaemia in 9.1% and Microcytic Hypochromic picture in 90.9 % of the patients. Initial haemoglobin of ANC patients was 9.8+/- 0.3g/dl. The initial haemoglobin of PNC patients was 9.73+/- 0.91g/dl. 59.3% of the patient had a haemoglobin between 7.1 and 10.0g/dl. Final haemoglobin of an ANC patient was 11.68+/-0.98g/dl, PNC patients 11.69+/-0.99g/dl. There was a substantial increase in Group Ahaemoglobin (oral iron) raising from 10.2+/-7.2g/dl to 12.0+/-0.92g/dl with a T value of 9.25. as well as in Group B (iron sucrose) raising from 9.3+/-8.5g/dl to 11.3+/-0g/dl with T value of 5.65. In both cases this raise in haemoglobin after four weeks had a p value less than 0.01 which was highly statistically signicant. Conclusion:Intravenous iron sucrose is more effective than oral iron for correction of anaemia with lesser side-effect