Abstract

Several guidelines advocate the same treatment approaches for both early disseminated Lyme borreliosis, manifested as multiple erythema migrans (EM), and early localized Lyme borreliosis, manifested as solitary EM. Oral doxycycline (100 mg q12h) was compared on a non-inferiority premise with intravenous ceftriaxone (2 g q24h) for 14 days in 200 adult European patients with multiple EM in an open-label alternate-treatment observational trial performed in a single-centre university hospital. Treatment outcome was assessed at 14 days and at 2, 6 and 12 months post-enrolment. Non-specific symptoms in patients and 192 control subjects without a history of Lyme borreliosis were evaluated and compared. This trial was registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT01163994). At the 12 month visit, 4/82 (4.9%) multiple EM patients prescribed doxycycline and 6/88 (6.8%) multiple EM patients prescribed ceftriaxone showed incomplete response manifested predominantly as post-Lyme symptoms (1.9% difference, upper limit of 95% CI 5.1%). The upper limit of 95% CI for the difference in proportion of patients with incomplete response between doxycycline and ceftriaxone groups did not exceed the predetermined non-inferiority margin of 10%. The frequency of non-specific symptoms in patients was similar to that in controls. The 14 day oral doxycycline was not inferior to the 14 day intravenous ceftriaxone in treatment of adult European patients with early disseminated Lyme borreliosis manifested as multiple EM. The frequency of non-specific symptoms in patients was similar to that in controls without a history of Lyme borreliosis.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.