Oral cancer screening prevalence in low-income adults before and after the ACA

Abstract

BackgroundDetecting oral cancer early is associated with higher probability of survival, reduced treatment costs, and improved quality of life. Unfortunately, <30% of oral cancers are detected early. Recent health insurance expansions from the Affordable Care Act (ACA) could improve outcomes by increasing access to screening. However, due to the differences in screening practices by physicians and dentists, the impact of expanded access to insurance on oral cancer screenings remains unknown. MethodsSelf-reported oral cancer screening data were obtained from The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for years 2011–2017. NHANES questionnaires ask respondents if they have received an oral cancer screen from a physician or dentist in the past year. Along with adjusting for demographic characteristics, this study accounts for unobserved heterogeneity by comparing “Differences-in-Differences” estimates of low-income adults (<200 % FPL) with high-income adults, before and after the ACA (2014), for adults most exposed (<age 65) to insurance expansion. ResultsBefore and after the ACA, low-income adults had the lowest prevalence of oral cancer screenings. However, relative to high-income adults, the ACA was associated with a 5–6%-point increase in oral cancer screenings for low-income adults under age 65, but only for screenings performed by dentists. ConclusionsOverall, oral cancer screening rates have been declining across the population, but the ACA may have slowed the decline in low-income adults. Understanding why oral cancer screenings are declining could inform cancer control policies. Research evaluating the impact of access to oral cancer screenings remains warranted.