Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Program Websites Under-Report Content Related to Resident Recruitment and Education

Abstract

Prospective applicants use residency program websites (PWs) to evaluate programs when deciding where to apply, interview, and rank. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the content of oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) PWs. This is a cross-sectional study of all OMS programs accredited by the Commission on Dental Accreditation. PWs were identified through the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Program Directory (AAOMS-PD) and a secondary internet search. The predictor variables were program characteristics (federal service, medical school curriculum, program size, and viability of AAOMS-PD link). The outcome variables were 22 content items related to resident recruitment and resident education and 4 content items related to medical school commitment. Content was recorded as present or absent without judgment on the quality or accuracy. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all outcome variables, and Student t tests were used to compare program characteristics with the amount of content reported. Ninety-six of 101 programs had dedicated PWs. On average, programs included 39% (range, 0 to 77%) of the recruitment and education items assessed. Most programs did not address crucial aspects of training, such as faculty research interests (22%), resident selection criteria (22%), alumni rosters (19%), surgical case load (13%), and dedicated scholarly time (8.8%). Less than half the 6-year programs discussed a tuition responsibility (44%) or tuition assistance (21%). Four-year programs provided significantly less recruitment content (P<.01) and 4-year (P<.01) and federal (P<.01) programs reported significantly less resident education content. As a whole, OMS PWs are under-reporting content related to resident recruitment and resident education. Program directors should update their PWs to provide adequate information for prospective applicants.