Abstract
This paper presents an attempt at conducting an analysis of the notion “optionality” based on the works of experts in the given sphere. There is a certain lack of consistency in the matter of understanding and interpretation of the given phenomenon in the linguistic literature.Some scientists mean by optionality an opportunity to substitute one synonymic word by the other without significant changes in the plane of content; others recognize ellipsis in it, while the third party-an optional combinability.The issue of faculty has obtained the widest discussion in sinology. According to one of the theories, optionality can be studied against redundancy and economy of language means. In this case the phenomenon of optionality in the Chinese language can manifest itself on the level of phonemes, morphemes and lexemes. Functioning of grammatical markers expressing aspect, tense, number, etc. can serve as an example, as it possesses the property of optionality.The majority of scholars agree that optionality is an objective property of language system and is closely connected with the process of the language ongoing development.
Highlights
The dictionary of foreign languages provides the following definition of the word “optional” (French “facultatif”): “optional”-not obligatory, free to choose
Some scientists mean by optionality an opportunity to substitute one synonymic word by the other without significant changes in the plane of content; others recognize ellipsis in it, while the third party-an optional combinability
Some scientists mean by optionality an opportunity to substitute one synonymic grammar wordform by the other without significant changes in the plane of content (Bilyalova, 2010, 2012); some recognize ellipsis in it (McGregor, 2013; Fry, 2003) or an optional combinability (Kittila, 2005), while others investigate optionality in close connection with language variation (Biber et al, 2001)
Summary
The dictionary of foreign languages provides the following definition of the word “optional” (French “facultatif”): “optional”-not obligatory, free to choose. It seems impossible to deny the existence and functioning of the optionality phenomenon. In this respect we completely agree with N.V. Solntseva who states that “optionality is an objective phenomenon determined by peculiarities of the language structure and development” (Solntseva, 1963). Solntseva who states that “optionality is an objective phenomenon determined by peculiarities of the language structure and development” (Solntseva, 1963) Such controversy breeds necessity to analyze the phenomenon of optionality itself, as well as its various manifestations depending on a language system type, clarification of optional usage of language means and delimitation of optionality and quasi-optionality
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
