Abstract

This paper aims to investigate the energy performance of several techniques integrated into the fenestration system of an office building. The first step was to compare the simulated and real energy consumption of a case study of an office building located in Tunis City. In a second step, the study explores the impact of a glazing retrofit solutions on annual energy saving. To determine the possible energy savings for the existing office building in various climatic zones, we performed several simulations, using the Design Builder software.For these zones, the optimum window-to-wall-ratio (WWR), ensuring a compromise between daylighting and energy consumption, is found to be 40%. Then, for the chosen WWR, we evaluated a retrofit process involving existing commercial technologies such as double-glazed insulated windows, as well as innovative technologies consisting of intelligent coating, in addition to passive techniques including several shading concepts.It is found that, the double-glazed window with outside reveal depth of 20 cm equipped with both low-emissivity (LoE) and electrochromic (EC) coatings ensures the lowest annual energy consumption. Besides, energy savings depends on the climate zone; it reaches 23% in hot climates (ZT3) and almost 20% in cold (ZT1) and temperate climates (ZT2). The possibility of using electrochromic coating was excluded following the economic study because of its exorbitant cost. In fact, this type of renovation can lead to payback periods of up to 74 years for the cases treated.The optimized window designs consist in using a double-glazing window with a LoE coating, an outside reveal depth of 20 cm, and as a shading system (Overhang). These designs save 8 to 20% of energy and reduce CO2 emissions by 6 to 10 kg CO2/m2 per year, with a payback period of less than 6 years depending on the climatic zone.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call