Abstract

Objectives In the present study, we evaluated the mechanical outcome of different configurations of cannulated compression screws for the fixation of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture and the stress distribution around the holes corresponding to fixation protocol after screws removal. Methods The Pauwels type III of femoral neck fracture was created in 3-matic software and the models of cannulated compression screws were constructed using UG-NX software. Five fixation systems were assembled to the fracture models. Abaqus software was used to perform the process of finite element analysis. Values of stress distribution, maximum stress, model principal strains of proximal fragment, and stress distribution around the holes of femur model were recorded. Results Stress of cannulated compression screws was intensely focused on the middle area of the screw near the fragment of each group. Inverted triangle model showed the highest peak stress on screws under different phases of load. Each screw dispersed some stresses, but at least one underwent the peak stress. Fracture model fixed by inverted triangle configuration showed the lowest volume of yielding strain in the proximal fragment. The area of higher stress around the holes was largest after triangle screws removal when compared with other four models. Conclusions Our study indicated that different cannulated compression screws fixation configurations for the unstable femoral neck fractures showed the different mechanical efficiency. Inverted triangular configuration showed the mechanical advantage and being less likely to cutout. The fixation strategy of triangle configuration was least recommended if patients tended to remove the implants.

Highlights

  • Femoral neck fracture (FNF) is a major public health problem and a common injury encountered by orthopaedic surgeons, which accounts for about 50% of hip fractures [1]

  • Fixation by three cannulated compression screws (CCS) has been remained a standard method for fixation of FNFs for many years [7, 8], debate continues regarding the configurations of screws fixation

  • We investigated whether different threeCCS configurations had the mechanical distinction for the fixation of unstable FNF and analyzed the effect of different configurations after screws removal on the strength of femur using finite element analysis (FEA)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Femoral neck fracture (FNF) is a major public health problem and a common injury encountered by orthopaedic surgeons, which accounts for about 50% of hip fractures [1]. Treatment recommendations depend on the patient’s age and fracture type [2]. Various treatment strategies, including compression screws, locked plates, dynamic condylar screws, and sliding hip screws, are available to treat young patients with FNFs by anatomic reduction and stable fixation to minimize the possibility of nonunion and osteonecrosis [3,4,5]. Despite the method of the fixation, prevalence of complications like nonunion and fixation failure has been reported between 10 and 30% [6]. Fixation by three cannulated compression screws (CCS) has been remained a standard method for fixation of FNFs for many years [7, 8], debate continues regarding the configurations of screws fixation. Even if fractures have healed uneventfully, internal fixation can

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call