Abstract

In the pursuit of enhancing user engagement within Confluence-based knowledge repositories, this paper details the development of an advanced scoring system tailored to evaluate content efficacy. Central to this system is the normalization of disparate content metrics against a common scale and the strategic weighting of key performance indicators—such as engagement, timeliness of updates, frequency of edits, content length, and collaborative contributions. The confluence of these metrics culminates in a composite score per content piece, enabling a nuanced appraisal of its value. Employing Z-scores for benchmarking facilitates the delineation of content into actionable tiers, thus informing a data-driven approach to content management. This scoring framework, with its capacity to quantify and qualify user-content interaction, presents a transformative tool for knowledge management, ensuring that content not only resonates with its audience but also aligns with organizational objectives.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call