Abstract
Speech is the most used communication method between humans and it is considered a multisensory process. Even though there is a popular belief that speech is something that we hear, there is overwhelming evidence that the brain treats speech as something that we hear and see. Much of the research has focused on Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems, treating speech primarily as an acoustic form of communication. In the last years, there has been an increasing interest in systems for Automatic Lip-Reading (ALR), although exploiting the visual information has been proved to be challenging. One of the main problems in ALR is how to make the system robust to the visual ambiguities that appear at the word level. These ambiguities make confused and imprecise the definition of the minimum distinguishable unit of the video domain. In contrast to the audio domain, where the phoneme is the standard minimum auditory unit, there is no consensus on the definition of the minimum visual unit (the viseme). In this work, we focus on the automatic construction of a phoneme-to-viseme mapping based on visual similarities between phonemes to maximize word recognition. We investigate the usefulness of different phoneme-to-viseme mappings, obtaining the best results for intermediate vocabulary lengths. We construct an automatic system that uses DCT and SIFT descriptors to extract the main characteristics of the mouth region and HMMs to model the statistic relations of both viseme and phoneme sequences. We test our system in two Spanish corpora with continuous speech (AV@CAR and VLRF) containing 19 and 24 speakers, respectively. Our results indicate that we are able to recognize 47% (resp. 51%) of the phonemes and 23% (resp. 21%) of the words, for AV@CAR and VLRF. We also show additional results that support the usefulness of visemes. Experiments on a comparable ALR system trained exclusively using phonemes at all its stages confirm the existence of strong visual ambiguities between groups of phonemes. This fact and the higher word accuracy obtained when using phoneme-to-viseme mappings, justify the usefulness of visemes instead of the direct use of phonemes for ALR.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have