Abstract
AbstractNitrogen fertilizer application and increasing planting density have been recognized as essential measures to achieve higher wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yields. However, inadequate management practices often lead to poor culm quality and lodging. We hypothesized that optimizing culm characteristics could be a feasible approach to improving both lodging resistance and yield. In this study, field experiments involved five nitrogen levels (0, 180, 240, 300, and 360 kg ha−1) and three planting densities (225, 375, and 525 × 104 ha−1). Two wheat cultivars with different lodging resistance were selected and their culm morphological characteristics, biochemical components, field lodging rate, and yield in different treatments were measured. We found that field lodging rate in wheat was negatively correlated with yield, and there was a contradiction between increasing spike number and lodging resistance. Culm carbohydrate accumulation affected field lodging rate by regulating culm quality rather than the center of gravity height. Compared with Xinmai 26, Xinhuamai 818 had higher culm carbohydrate accumulation, which increased the breaking strength and yield by 14.2% and 17.0%. Nitrogen application and planting density had significant effects on yield and lodging resistance. Compared with N0 treatment, increasing nitrogen application rate improved yield of 67.2%–83.2% by increasing spike number and grain number per spike, and the N2 treatment showed the largest increase. Planting density had little effect on yield. Reducing planting density can increase the culm carbohydrate accumulation and enhance lodging resistance. Compared with D3 treatment, the culm breaking strength was increased by 27.6% under the D1 treatment. This study determined that the optimal combination of nitrogen and density for improving wheat lodging resistance and yield is 240 kg ha−1 and 225 × 104 ha−1. This combination enhances culm breaking strength by increasing carbohydrate accumulation and achieves high yield by increasing grain number per spike, 1000‐grain weight, and stabilizing spike number.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.