Abstract

The VECTRA® XT 3D simulation program is a valuable tool for implant selection during the decision-making process of breast augmentations. The software allows for the assignment of automatically or manually positioned anatomical landmarks and provides accompanying measurements. This study aimed to present a strategy for standardizing landmark placement on Vectra® images during primary breast augmentations, optimize implant selection, and insure consistency in breast width data collection. We performed a retrospective analysis of patient data wherein breast width measurements were obtained through Clinical Assessment (CA) and the Vectra® program using both automatically (VA) and manually (VM) placed landmarks. Consideration was also given to the thickness of medial and lateral breast tissues. The suggested implant base width from all groups was then compared to the actual implant (AI) used during surgical procedures. Comparing the change rates in relation to the actual implant width revealed that rates in CA measurements were significantly lower than those in VA (p < 0.05), and similarly lower than those in VM (p < 0.05). Furthermore, change rates in VM were significantly lower than in VA (p < 0.05). Each group showed a significant positive correlation with the actual implant width. The Vectra® XT 3D simulation program is a valuable adjunct in breast augmentation. However, relying on it solely may lead to inaccuracies in the assessment of breast dimensions due to automatic landmarking. To achieve standardized measurements, landmarks can be marked on the patient before creating the Vectra® image. Our results underline the superiority of clinical judgment over simulation programs in establishing a reliable surgical plan.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call