Abstract

We are currently in the midst of Earth's sixth extinction event, and measuring biodiversity trends in space and time is essential for prioritizing limited resources for conservation. At the same time, the scope of the necessary biodiversity monitoring is overwhelming funding for professional scientific monitoring. In response, scientists are increasingly using citizen science data to monitor biodiversity. But citizen science data are ‘noisy’, with redundancies and gaps arising from unstructured human behaviours in space and time. We ask whether the information content of these data can be maximized for the express purpose of trend estimation. We develop and execute a novel framework which assigns every citizen science sampling event a marginal value, derived from the importance of an observation to our understanding of overall population trends. We then make this framework predictive, estimating the expected marginal value of future biodiversity observations. We find that past observations are useful in forecasting where high-value observations will occur in the future. Interestingly, we find high value in both ‘hotspots’, which are frequently sampled locations, and ‘coldspots’, which are areas far from recent sampling, suggesting that an optimal sampling regime balances ‘hotspot’ sampling with a spread across the landscape.

Highlights

  • Assessing biodiversity trends in space and time is essential for conservation [1,2,3,4,5]

  • At multiple spatial scales [6], allow us to track our global progress in curbing biodiversity loss while managing our scarce conservation resources [1]

  • One of the reasons that optimal sampling has been largely ignored in unstructured citizen science projects is because redundancies and gaps in the data are seen as a ‘necessary hurdle’ [41]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Assessing biodiversity trends in space and time is essential for conservation [1,2,3,4,5]. Observers submitting observations on weekends [30], sampling near roads and human settlements [31], and visiting known ‘hotspots’ for biodiversity [32] are all examples of how unstructured human behaviour leads to redundancies and gaps in citizen science data [33]. These biases are not restricted to citizen science projects. One of the reasons that optimal sampling has been largely ignored in unstructured citizen science projects is because redundancies and gaps in the data are seen as a ‘necessary hurdle’ [41]. We (i) used 25 995 eBird citizen science sampling events, (ii) analysed linear trends for 235 species, (iii) calculated a measure of statistical leverage (i.e. marginal value)—the influence a given observation has on the population trend model of a species—for all checklists for each species, (iv) summed the leverages on a given checklist to provide a measure of marginal value for every checklist (i.e. the cumulative value/importance of a sampling event to inform our total knowledge of species’ trends, across many species), (v) tested specific predictions (appendix 1 in the electronic supplementary material) which may influence the marginal value of a citizen science sampling event [33], and (vi) used these associations to predict the expected marginal value on a daily basis

Methods
Sep 2018
50. Stuart-Smith RD et al 2017 Assessing national
57. Baillie JE et al 2008 Toward monitoring global
Findings
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call