Optimizing column-to-column retention time alignment in high-speed gas chromatography by combining retention time locking and correlation optimized warping

Abstract

We examine and then optimize alignment of chromatograms collected on nominally identical columns using retention time locking (RTL), an instrumental alignment tool, and software-based alignment using correlation optimized warping (COW). For this purpose, three samples are constructed by spiking two sets of analytes into a base test mixture. The three samples are analyzed by high-speed gas chromatography with four nominally identical columns and identical separation conditions. The data is first analyzed without alignment, then using COW alone, then RTL alone, and finally with RTL followed by COW to correct the severe column-to-column misalignment. Principal component analysis (PCA) is used to investigate how well each alignment method clustered the chromatograms into the three sample classes via a scores plot without being compromised by the specific column(s) used. The degree-of-class separation (DCS) is used as a classification metric, measured as the Euclidian distance between the centroids of two clusters in PC space in the scores plot, normalized by their pooled variance. With no alignment, the average DCS between sample classes (DCSsam) was 3.0, while the average DCS between the four nominally identical columns, i.e., column classes (DCScol) was 76.1 (ideally the DCScol should be 0), indicating the chromatograms were initially classified by the columns used. Using either COW or RTL alone also produced unsatisfactory results, with COW alone incorrectly aligning many peaks, leading to a DCSsam of only 1.9 and DCScol of 1.7, while RTL alone provided a DCSsam of 4.7 and DCScol of 4.2. Finally, using RTL followed by COW alignment, DCSsam increased to 32.5, indicating successful classification by chemical differences between sample classes, while the DCScol decreased to 0.4, indicating virtually no classification due to column-to-column differences, as desired. Thus, RTL provided a “first-order” correction of the initial retention mismatch observed for the nominally identical columns, while additional alignment via COW was required to optimize sample classification by PCA.