Abstract
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves clinical outcome and survival in advanced heart failure. However, some patients do not respond clinically or show improvement in left ventricular function. Our focus has turned to why such “nonresponders” exist. Follow-up of CRT has led to several explanations, varying by individual patient, and has shown the importance of device programming in CRT in heart failure. The failing heart displays delayed contraction in the ventricle, also referred to as mechanical dyssynchrony. Simply pacing both ventricles simultaneously might not be adequate to optimize systolic function. Individually tailoring the atrioventricular (AV) timing can improve left ventricular filling and cardiac output, and adjusting the interventricular (VV) pacing delay has also been shown to improve hemodynamics. Increasing evidence regarding AV and VV optimization is emerging. This article reviews the current data on optimization, including the physiology, numerous approaches, and current issues.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
