Abstract

The study of structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging data has greatly benefitted from the development of sophisticated and efficient algorithms aimed at automating and optimizing the analysis of brain data. We address, in the context of the segmentation of brain from non-brain tissue (i.e., brain extraction, also known as skull-stripping), the tension between the increased theoretical and clinical interest in patient data, and the difficulty of conventional algorithms to function optimally in the presence of gross brain pathology. Indeed, because of the reliance of many algorithms on priors derived from healthy volunteers, images with gross pathology can severely affect their ability to correctly trace the boundaries between brain and non-brain tissue, potentially biasing subsequent analysis. We describe and make available an optimized brain extraction script for the pathological brain (optiBET) robust to the presence of pathology. Rather than attempting to trace the boundary between tissues, optiBET performs brain extraction by (i) calculating an initial approximate brain extraction; (ii) employing linear and non-linear registration to project the approximate extraction into the MNI template space; (iii) back-projecting a standard brain-only mask from template space to the subject’s original space; and (iv) employing the back-projected brain-only mask to mask-out non-brain tissue. The script results in up to 94% improvement of the quality of extractions over those obtained with conventional software across a large set of severely pathological brains. Since optiBET makes use of freely available algorithms included in FSL, it should be readily employable by anyone having access to such tools.

Highlights

  • In the past 20 years, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has gained a prominent role in the study of brain structure and function in healthy and pathological brains

  • These difficulties are principally due to the fact that the performance of many skull-stripping algorithms is based on Bayesian priors derived from the healthy brain (e.g., FMRIB’s Software Library (FSL)’s Brain Extraction Tool; BET, [8]; Analysis of Functional NeuroImages (AFNI)’s 3dSkullStrip, [2]) which are not representative of severely damaged brains and can perform sub-optimally in the presence of gross pathology

  • In this paper we addressed the tension between the growing interest surrounding functional and structural MRI research in clinically relevant populations and the difficulty of standard algorithms to cope with severe brain pathology

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the past 20 years, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has gained a prominent role in the study of brain structure and function in healthy and pathological brains. There are some circumstances in which these tools encounter difficulties which might result in suboptimal performance and risk biasing results (see [5]) One such circumstance is the study of function and structure in severely pathological brains. We focus on the challenges posed by this population to the process of brain extraction, which is to say the separation of brain from non-brain tissue (including the skull, neck, eyes, etc.) These difficulties are principally due to the fact that the performance of many skull-stripping algorithms is based on Bayesian priors derived from the healthy brain (e.g., FSL’s Brain Extraction Tool; BET, [8]; AFNI’s 3dSkullStrip, [2]) which are not representative of severely damaged brains and can perform sub-optimally in the presence of gross pathology. Structural analysis of local or global brain shape and volume, tractography, brain registration, as well as functional localization in ‘standard’ space may result in biased estimates

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call