Abstract

In recent years, researchers have been devoted to illustrating the correlation between bankers’ pay contracts and a bank’s risk-taking behavior where corporate governance is concerned, especially throughout the past four decades and by using empirical analysis. Despite being a widespread concern, the causality of this relationship is not thoroughly understood. We initiate this research by modeling bankers’ multi-stage decisions of option investment and bond investment from the perspective of theoretical analysis, and by analyzing the function image results using data from Wells Fargo & Co. from the ExecuComp, BvD Orbis, and CRSP-COMPUSTAT databases. We aim to deeply explore the mechanism of how compensation influencing on risk. We are the first to find that it has a “risk cap”, which is the optimal risk level to maximize the return of decision-making. We are also the first to discover the optimal decision coefficient level to maximize the decision return, during which the internal causes and mechanisms of the impact of bankers’ compensation on a bank’s default risk are revealed. We also illustrate the influence of the number of periods. We expect our findings to provide advice for establishing policies when designing pay contracts.

Highlights

  • We initiate this research by setting up a multi-stage decision-making model, containing both option investment and bond investment, to deeply explore the mechanism of how compensation influencing on risk, based on our previous work (Ma et al, 2020 [22,23]) on a banker’s long-term compensation and the design of pay contracts

  • We demonstrate the relationship between the decision return of multi-stages and both the risk and the decision weight of the bank by developing a particular formula

  • We are the first to find the presence of a “risk cap”, where the maximum point in this cap is the optimal risk level to maximize the return of decision-making

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 1976, Jensen and Meckling [1] first published their paper regarding executive compensation, which belongs to the field of corporate governance. Since this field has become an object of increasing concern for related scholars. According to the different proportions of option investment and bond investment in the total decision-making process, and the variance of default risk level, the return of executives varies. The aim of this paper is to determine the optimal level of the default risk and decision weight level (invest more option or bond) in order to find out the deeper mechanism regarding how compensation influences the risk levels of banks—namely, through the decisions of bankers

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call