Abstract

The optimization of heat exchangers requires a goal function. A very common choice for this goal function is a performance evaluation criterion (PEC). However, most commonly used PECs are not only a function of the heat exchanger geometry, but also of the Reynolds number. For such optimizations, the Reynolds number should not be kept fixed as shown in this paper. Furthermore, the current work demonstrates how to account for the influence of the Reynolds number correctly, to maintain the physical meaning of the PEC. This method is applied to the optimization of the X-shaped louvered fin and round tube heat exchanger. The variable geometry VG-1 criterion is used as the PEC. A surrogate model is used to enhance the performance of the optimization routine.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call