Abstract

Calibration of conceptual rainfall–runoff models (CRRM) for water-resource assessment (WRA) is a complicated task that contributes to the reliability of results obtained from catchments. In recent decades, the application of automatic calibration techniques has been frequently used because of the increasing complexity of models and the considerable time savings gained at this phase. In this work, the traditional Rosenbrock (RNB) algorithm is combined with a random sampling method and the Latin hypercube (LH) to optimize a multi-start strategy and test the efficiency in the calibration of CRRMs. Three models (the French rural-engineering-with-four-daily-parameters (GR4J) model, the Swedish Hydrological Office Water-balance Department (HBV) model and the Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting (SAC-SMA) model) are selected for WRA at nine headwaters in Spain in zones prone to long and severe droughts. To assess the results, the University of Arizona’s shuffled complex evolution (SCE-UA) algorithm was selected as a benchmark, because, until now, it has been one of the most robust techniques used to solve calibration problems with rainfall–runoff models. This comparison shows that the traditional algorithm can find optimal solutions at least as good as the SCE-UA algorithm. In fact, with the calibration of the SAC-SMA model, the results are significantly different: The RNB algorithm found better solutions than the SCE-UA for all basins. Finally, the combination created between the LH and RNB methods is detailed thoroughly, and a sensitivity analysis of its parameters is used to define the set of optimal values for its efficient performance.

Highlights

  • Hydrological modelling is essential for water-resource assessment (WRA) [1]

  • A traditional local-search algorithm coupled with a random sampling method as a designer and optimizer of a multi-start strategy was tested

  • The combination was compared to an evolutionary algorithm for the calibration of three conceptual rainfall–runoff models (CRRM) with different complexities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hydrological modelling is essential for water-resource assessment (WRA) [1]. Hydrologists have come to rely on hydrological models to foresee events that would otherwise be difficult to predict [2].Estimating flows that run in a basin through a drainage system is one of the greatest tools available to address hydrological problems [3].Currently, there are many hydrological models that can be used for WRA [4]. Hydrological modelling is essential for water-resource assessment (WRA) [1]. Hydrologists have come to rely on hydrological models to foresee events that would otherwise be difficult to predict [2]. There are many hydrological models that can be used for WRA [4]. Runoff models (CRRM) are often used, because they offer simplified catchment-scale representations of the transformation of precipitation into river discharge [5]. Their efficient calibration is a difficult issue, even for experienced hydrologists [6]. The models are characterised by parameters that cannot

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call