Abstract

A comprehensive mathematical model of the performance of the cathode-supported solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) with syngas fuel is presented. The model couples the intricate interdependency between the ionic conduction, electronic conduction, gas transport, the electrochemical reaction processes in the functional layers and on the electrode/electrolyte interfaces, methane steam reforming (MSR) and the water gas shift reaction (WGSR). The validity of the mathematical model is demonstrated by the excellent agreement between the numerical and experimental I-V curves. The effect of anode rib width and cathode rib width on gas diffusion and cell performance is examined. The results show conclusively that the cell performance is strongly influenced by the rib width. Furthermore, the anode optimal rib width is smaller than that for cathode, which is contrary to anode-supported SOFC. Finally, the formulae for the anode and cathode optimal rib width are given, which provide an easy to use guidance for the broad SOFC engineering community.

Highlights

  • Solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) is considered to be one of the more promising new energy technologies [1,2,3]

  • In order to investigate the influence of the rib width on the cell performance, four models were established with the same settings as described above except the size of interconnector geometry an ca

  • It is obvious that the H2 concentration gradients in the vertical direction are small, which is beneficial for a thin anode

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) is considered to be one of the more promising new energy technologies [1,2,3]. There has been a great deal of research aiming to increase the performance of a single SOFC by looking for new electrodes and electrolyte materials, optimizing electrode microstructure or improving electrode and electrolyte preparation techniques [4,5,6,7,8,9,10] and so on. There are many factors limiting the performance of SOFC as part of a stack. One of the primary factors is the additional losses caused by the interconnector geometry. Additional losses are created by two main aspects: (i) the interconnector used in a stack can cause a significant contact resistance between the electrode and the interconnector; (ii) the interconnector limits gas diffusion in electrode

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.