Abstract

Conventional conveyance systems using wheels and belt conveyors occur friction and wear at the contact portions. In order to solve these problems, a noncontact conveyance system has been developed[1][2].In this research, a permanent magnet repulsion levitation system and superconducting magnetic levitation system are adopted. The permanent magnet repulsion levitation system cause a large levitating force at the loading part. Superconducting magnetic levitation system cause a stable levitation at the carrier body. There is no influence of large load weight on the levitation of the carrier because the loading part and the carrier body are connected by the linear way. The carrier moves above the magnetic rail. The coils are installed on magnetic rail, and the magnetic field gradient is generated by the exciting coils. The carrier is propelled by the magnetic field gradient. By increasing the flux of the coil behind the HTS in the propulsion direction and reducing the flux of the HTS in the propulsion direction, magnetic field gradient is generated and the carrier propels. The coil pitch is optimized and propulsion force is examined by adding the exciting coils [3] [4]Fig.1 shows the experimental device[4]. The change of the magnetic field gradient is analyzed when changing the coil pitch by 5mm in the range of 25~50mm with the FEM analysis software JMAG-Designer[5]. The propulsion force is confirmed by the experimental results. The experimental condition is as follows; current of the coil I=2.0A and levitation gap g=23mm. The propulsion force is measured by the load cell installed in front of the carrier.From the analytical result, when the coil pitch is changed, the position of peak value of the flux density due to the magnetization and demagnetization on the magnetic rail changes, but the crest value of the magnetic field gradient is not changed. In the range of coil pitch 40~50mm, the excitation coils are separated. The flat section is formed between the positive peak value and the negative one in the magnetic gradient field. Thus, in the z-axis direction, the surface flux density of the HTS is the strongest at the center.Fig.2 (a) shows the average value and the maximum value of the propulsion force at each the coil pitch. At the coil pitch 50mm, both the average propulsion force and the maximum propulsion force are largest. As a result, the optimum value of the coil pitch under the HTS is 50mm. Center of the HTS keeps the largest flux from the permanent magnet. The coils arearranged on the magnetic rail at the coil pitch 50mm, as the diameter of the coil used in this research is 22mm, only the odd number coil in Fig.1 (b) will be installed. Thus, the excitation switching interval becomes large. Thus, as shown in Fig.1 (b), coils are installed at intervals of 25mm. At first, No.1 coil and No.3 coil in Fig.1 (b) are excited. Next, No.2 coil and No.4 coil are excited. In this way, the coils to be excited are switched, and coil pitch 50mm is realized.The case of exciting the coil between the two excited coils is considered.No.1 coil shown in Fig.1 (b) is magnetized, No.2 and No.3 coils are demagnetized. The flux density in the y-axis direction at that time is analyzed with the magnetic analysis software JMAG-Designer. In the range of x=-20~20, the flux density in the y-axis direction in three excitation coil case is smaller than that in two excitation coil case. As the magnetic rail is composed of Halbach array, the y-axis direction flux densityis strong on the magnetic rail. Therefore, the change of the flux due to the excitation of the coil tends to occur in the y-axis direction. The propulsion force is compared when exciting two coils at intervals of 50mm with the propulsion force when three coils are excited at intervals of 25mm. No.1 coil in Fig.1 (b) is magnetized, No.2 and No.3 coils are demagnetized. The load weight up to 58.8N is placed on the carrier.Fig.2 (b) shows the maximum propulsion force for each load weight. Larger propulsion force is given when No.1, No.2 and No.3 coil in Fig.1 (b) are excited t at all load weight. This is because the range of the magnetic field gradient is increased by adding a coil to be excited. In the case of three coils excitation, as the change of flux density in the y-axis direction is large,it is necessary to consider the magnetic gradient field in the y-axis direction. In the case of two coils excitation, it is suitable to install the coils at intervals of 50mm so as to catch the center of the HTS. In addition, in the case of three coils excitation the propulsion force increases by generating a gradient in the flux density in the y-axis direction. **

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call