Abstract

In load rejection transitional processes in pumped-storage plants (PSPs), the process of closing pump turbines, including guide vane (GVCS) and ball valve closing schemes (BVCS), is crucial for controlling pulsating pressures and water hammer. Extreme pressures generated during the load rejection process may result in fatigue damage to turbines, and cracks or even bursts in the penstocks. In this study, the closing schemes for pump turbine guide vanes and ball valves are optimized to minimize water hammer and pulsating pressures. A model is first developed to simulate water hammer pressures and to estimate pulsating pressures at the spiral case and draft tube of a pump turbine. This is combined with genetic algorithms (GA) or non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) to realize single- or multi-objective optimizations. To increase the applicability of the optimized result to different scenarios, the optimization model is further extended by considering two different load-rejection scenarios: full load-rejection of one pump versus two pump turbines, simultaneously. The fuzzy membership degree method provides the best compromise solution for the attained Pareto solutions set in the multi-objective optimization. Employing these optimization models, robust closing schemes can be developed for guide vanes and ball valves under various design requirements.

Highlights

  • In recent years, pumped-storage power plants (PSPs) have become increasingly important in stabilizing and balancing electricity [1,2,3]

  • To overcome shortcomings in existing guide vane closing schemes (GVCSs) optimization, this paper introduces a method limited in practicalthe application

  • The numerical model was validated by field tests and was combined with evolutionary algorithms to optimize the pump turbine closing operations (i.e., GVCS and ball valve closing schemes (BVCS))

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In recent years, pumped-storage power plants (PSPs) have become increasingly important in stabilizing and balancing electricity [1,2,3]. Et al.closing [10] introduced joint closing scheme of guide vane peak and ball loadZeng rejection and theoretically analyzed effectsscheme of the GVCS on water hammer and pulsating pressures the indicated that the jointthe closing can effectively reduce the second pressure peakbased at theon spiral transient characteristics of pump turbines in the the effects. A closing out schemes, single-objective andinnovations multi-objective optimization of GVCS and BVCS(1)are method of peak-to-peak diagrams applied estimate dynamic pressures, new objective carried out in load rejection in theis PSP. (2) new objective functions considering water hammer and pulsating pressures are designed to meet different engineering requirements, and (3) both single load rejection and load rejection of two units are incorporated within the optimization model to broaden the applicability of the optimized results.

Hydraulic Transient Simulation with Pulsating Pressure Estimation
Pipeline System Model
Pump Turbine Model
Characteristic curves of pump turbine:
Estimating
design
Formulations for Optimization of Pump Turbine Closing Process
Objective Functions
Constraints
System Specification of the PSP and Field Tests
Comparison measuredand andsimulated simulated rotational
Case 1
12. Optimized closing schemesininCase
Case 2
Case 3
18. Comparison of optimized closing
19. Comparison ofofwater pressureand and dynamic pressure envelopes between two
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.