Abstract

The early detection of large-vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes is increasingly important as these patients are potential candidates for endovascular therapy, the availability of which is limited. Prehospital LVO detection scales mainly contain symptom variables only; however, recent studies revealed that other types of variables could be useful as well. Our aim was to comprehensively assess the predictive ability of several clinical variables for LVO prediction and to develop an optimal combination of them using machine learning tools. We have retrospectively analysed data from a prospectively collected multi-centre stroke registry. Data on 41 variables were collected and divided into four groups (baseline vital parameters/demographic data, medical history, laboratory values, and symptoms). Following the univariate analysis, the LASSO method was used for feature selection to select an optimal combination of variables, and various machine learning methods (random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), elastic net method (ENM), and simple neural network (SNN)) were applied to optimize the performance of the model. A total of 526 patients were included. Several neurological symptoms were more common and more severe in the group of LVO patients. Atrial fibrillation (AF) was more common, and serum white blood cell (WBC) counts were higher in the LVO group, while systolic blood pressure (SBP) was lower among LVO patients. Using the LASSO method, nine variables were selected for modelling (six symptom variables, AF, chronic heart failure, and WBC count). When applying machine learning methods and 10-fold cross validation using the selected variables, all models proved to have an AUC between 0.736 (RF) and 0.775 (LR), similar to the performance of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (AUC: 0.790). Our study highlights that, although certain neurological symptoms have the best ability to predict an LVO, other variables (such as AF and CHF in medical history and white blood cell counts) should also be included in multivariate models to optimize their efficiency.

Highlights

  • Large-vessel occlusion (LVO) is present in 20–40% of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) cases, resulting in more severe symptoms and worse outcomes if not treated urgently [1]

  • intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) could be started as soon as possible; the time spent in the primary stroke center (PSC) and the time of transportation may significantly delay the administration of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) [5]

  • A cross-sectional, observational study was performed based on a prospective registry of consecutive AIS patients presenting up to 4.5 h after symptom onset at the comprehensive stroke centres (CSC) of three university hospitals in Hungary (Figure S1 of the Supplementary Materials) between

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Large-vessel occlusion (LVO) is present in 20–40% of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) cases, resulting in more severe symptoms and worse outcomes if not treated urgently [1]. If the presence of an LVO is confirmed, the patient is referred and transported to a CSC for EVT (drip-and-ship approach). In these cases, IVT could be started as soon as possible; the time spent in the PSC and the time of transportation may significantly delay the administration of EVT [5]. The second approach is to transport patients with a high likelihood of LVO directly to a CSC (mothership approach) This may slightly delay the start of the IVT due to the longer transportation time; it could significantly reduce the time to EVT administration [5]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call