Optimization of intraoperative lumpectomy specimen labeling

Abstract

BackgroundAccurate lumpectomy specimen orientation is critical as incorrect orientation may result in excision of the wrong lumpectomy margin. Our goal was to determine if specimen orientation achieved by labeling three surfaces is superior to two. MethodsThis was a prospective single-institution study including 22 breast surgical oncologists. Intraoperative labeling of either two or three surfaces of the lumpectomy specimen was based on surgeon preference. The specimen was delivered to Pathology where it was oriented by the pathology team and the surgeon then determined if the specimen was correctly oriented or if re-orientation was required. Surgeons subsequently recorded orientation technique and if re-orientation was required. Specimen weight, patient age, and BMI were recorded. Fisher’s exact test and two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to determine p-values. ResultsOf 268 specimens, 40 (14.9%) required re-orientation. Labeling specimens on three surfaces was superior to two (22 of 195 (11.2%) versus 18 of 73 (24.6%), p = 0.01). Specimens requiring re-orientation were more likely to be heavier (36 g vs. 24 g, p = 0.02). In multivariable analysis, labeling specimens on three surfaces resulted in a 70% reduction in discordance rates between the surgeon and pathology team (OR 0.3, p = 0.001). Using mean weight of lumpectomy specimens, specimens >33 g were more likely to require reorientation (OR 2.8, p = 0.004). Age and BMI did not impact the need for re-orientation. ConclusionLumpectomy specimen labeling using three surfaces was superior to two. Surgeons should routinely orient their specimens on three or more surfaces to decrease discordance rates.