Abstract

The prediction of earth pressure balance (EPB) shield performance is an essential part of project scheduling and cost estimation of tunneling projects. This paper establishes an efficient multi-objective optimization model to predict the shield performance during the tunneling process. This model integrates the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) with the genetic algorithm (GA). The hybrid model uses shield operational parameters as inputs and computes the advance rate as output. GA enhances the accuracy of ANFIS for runtime parameters tuning by multi-objective fitness function. Prior to modeling, datasets were established, and critical operating parameters were identified through principal component analysis. Then, the tunneling case for Guangzhou metro line number 9 was adopted to verify the applicability of the proposed model. Results were then compared with those of the ANFIS model. The comparison showed that the multi-objective ANFIS-GA model is more successful than the ANFIS model in predicting the advance rate with a high accuracy, which can be used to guide the tunnel performance in the field.

Highlights

  • With the rapid development in many urban areas, tunnel boring machines (TBMs) are frequently used in excavation of long infrastructural tunneling projects

  • The artificial neural network (ANN) technique can adapt its abilities of learning and is effective to model a variety of real applications; it still has some limitations

  • When the input data is subject to a high level of uncertainty or ambiguity, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) techniques perform better [44]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

With the rapid development in many urban areas, tunnel boring machines (TBMs) are frequently used in excavation of long infrastructural tunneling projects. Proper estimation of TBM performance is an essential component of tunnel design and for the selection of appropriate excavation machine. Over the past few decades, several theoretical and empirical models have been developed for estimating TBM performance [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Input parameters in these theoretical and empirical models

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call