Abstract

This paper presents a method to find the optimal configuration for an electric vehicle energy storage system using a cascaded H-bridge (CHB) inverter. CHB multilevel inverters enable a better utilization of the battery pack, because cells/modules with manufacturing tolerances in terms of capacity can be selectively discharged instead of being passively balanced by discharging them over resistors. The balancing algorithms have been investigated in many studies for the CHB topology. However, it has not yet been investigated to which extend a conventional pack can be modularized in a CHB configuration. Therefore, this paper explores different configurations by simulating different switch models, switch configurations, and number of levels for a CHB inverter along with a reference load model to find the optimal design of the system. The configuration is also considered from an economically point of view, as the most efficient solution might not be cost-effective to be installed in a common production vehicle. It is found that four modules per phase give the best compromise between efficiency and costs. Paralleling smaller switches should be preferred over the usage of fewer, larger switches. Moreover, selecting specific existing components results in higher savings compared to theoretical optimal components.

Highlights

  • Lithium-ion batteries are currently the most preferred energy storage solution for battery electric vehicles (BEV)

  • The limits are set to simulate all possible combinations of the 63 switches, from one to 50 modules per phase and from one to 30 parallel metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) for each switch

  • This paper has described an approach to simulate different configurations of cascaded H-bridge (CHB) inverters for electric vehicles with different parameters, in order to identify the configuration with the highest possible cost savings

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lithium-ion batteries are currently the most preferred energy storage solution for battery electric vehicles (BEV). For such vehicles, they are the biggest cost contributor with up to. In a conventional BEV battery pack, many cells, sometimes several thousand, are connected in series and parallel to increase the voltage, capacity, and current rating of the pack according to the requirements. Cells, even from the same batch, have different parameters such as capacity and internal resistance [2,3,4]. Parallel connections of cells with different parameters result in self balancing currents between the respective cells, which cause additional losses and aging [6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.