Abstract

Magnetic lead screw (MLS) is a new type of linear actuator with high force density. Its output force depends not only on the arrangement of the permanent magnet (PM), but also on the materials used for the PMs, and the different materials of the PM directly affect the cost of the MLS. Therefore, based on this, a proposed MLS is given based on the combination of PM structure and magnetization direction and the combination of different PM materials. Compared with the traditional structures, it can not only improve the output force of the MLS, but also reduce the cost of the MLS. The results show that the size of air gap, the size of PM and the proportion of different materials combinations have great influence on the performance and cost of MLS. Finally, the performance of the proposed structure is compared with the traditional structures. The results show that the output force is increased by 21.5% and the cost is reduced by 21.4% under the same volume of MLS and PM.Index Terms — MLS, PM structure, magnetization direction, output force, cost.I.IntroductionIn recent years, as a new type of high force density linear actuator, magnetic lead screw (MLS) has been widely used in many fields, ranging from CNC machine tools, wave power generation to artificial heart [1-3]. MLS is similar to mechanical lead screw, which can convert linear motion into rotary motion, and vice versa. Compared with mechanical lead screw, MLS has the characteristics of inherent overload, minimum friction and low maintenance [4]. But for the existing applications and MLS structure, in addition to its output force is still low, there is also a problem of high cost caused by the use of high-performance PM materials in order to improve the output force of the MLS.Based on the above problems, a proposed MLS is given based on the combination of PM structure and magnetization direction and the combination of different PM materials, which improves the output force and decreases its cost. Detailed proposed structure introduction and operation principle are introduced in the second part. In the third part, the influence of the main parameters on the output force and cost is designed and optimized, and finally the size parameters of the structure are given. Finally, the performance of the proposed model is simulated and compared with the traditional structures to verify the superiority and economy of the proposed model.II.Structure and Operation PrincipleCompared with the traditional MLS structures, the proposed structure is shown in Fig. 1. The blue block and red block are radially magnetized PMs, in which the blue block is rectangular shape and the red block is salient pole shape, and both are made of NdFeB material. Green and yellow block are axially magnetized PMs with rectangular shape, and are made of other materials. Compared with the traditional halbach magnetizing array, this structure has higher output force and lower cost, and the structure is not difficult to process. The detailed operation principle of MLS is introduced in this paper.Fig.1. The proposed model.III.Design and OptimizationThe main design point of MLS is how to design the 3D structure of PM. There are three kinds of processing and installation structures, which are cylindrical, spiral and discrete surface mounted. In this part, the three structures will be compared in detail and the advantages and disadvantages of the description, and finally choose the appropriate shape for processing.After the structure is determined, the structure of the PM is optimized, mainly discussing the influence of the size of the air gap and PM on the output force and its cost of the MLS. In addition, the combination of different materials also has a great impact on the performance and cost of MLS, such as NdFeB, Ferrite, SmCo and Alnico. Finally, the best set of structural parameters of the MLS is obtained through the optimization, and the specific description is shown in the full text.IV.Results and ConclusionAfter design, optimization and analysis, the output force of the proposed model is shown in Fig. 2. It can be seen that the output force has increased by 21.5%. Moreover, after calculation, the cost of the proposed MLS is reduced by 21.4%, and the weight of the proposed MLS is also reduced by 8.6% due to the use of the combined materials of NdFeB and Ferrite, in which the proportion of NdFeB is 75.9% and Ferrite is 24.1%. In particular, limited by the number of words and pictures, we choose the traditional MLS for comparison, in which the PMs are rectangular and are made of NdFeB material.Fig.2. Performance comparison of the proposed model. **

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call