Abstract
The results obtained demonstrate significant scientific and technological contributions. The DFOPID controller achieved a purity of 99.50% wt, a recovery of 74.53%, and an energy efficiency of 69.52%, effectively handling disturbances and trajectory changes. In comparison, the discrete PID controller reached a purity of 99.42% wt, a recovery of 74.19%, and an energy efficiency of 61.10%. While the DFOPID exhibited superior performance and faster response to trajectory changes and disturbances, the discrete PID showed better energy efficiency. Both controllers are viable for industrial applications and PSA processes, as they meet the required purity standards for biofuel production.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
