Abstract

In order to meet the growing global demand for bioproducts, areas of forests planted for productive purposes tend to increase worldwide. However, there are several controversies about the possible negative impacts of such forests, such as invasive potential, influence on water balance and biodiversity, and competition with other types of land use. As a result, there is a need to optimize land use, in order to achieve improvements in terms of sustainability in the broadest sense. In this study, the environmental and economic performances of pine and eucalyptus forest production systems for multiple purposes are compared aiming an optimized allocation of land use in the Center-West Region of Brazil. Life cycle assessment, life cycle cost and analysis of financial and economic indicators were used to assess potential environmental and economic impacts, covering the agricultural and industrial phases of pine and eucalyptus forest systems managed for the production of cellulose and sawn wood and, for pine, the production of rosin and turpentine from the extraction of gumresin and by applying the kraft process. Subsequently, the TOPSIS multicriteria decision-making method was applied to rank production systems in different combinations of phases and criteria, and multi-objective optimization was used to allocate land use according to different restrictions of areas and efficiency. The adoption of cleaner energy sources and the use of more efficient machines, equipment and vehicles are the main solutions to improve the environmental and economic performance of the forestry sector. The production systems of pine for cellulose and pine for sawn wood, rosin and turpentine were identified as the best solutions to optimize land use. For this reason, they must be considered as alternatives for the expansion and diversification of the Brazilian forest productive chain.

Highlights

  • Climate change is challenging the current models of economic development based on fossil resources, and expectations of growth of the world population indicate that there will be a greater pressure on natural resources necessary for human well-being [1]

  • The concept of bioeconomics is discussed from two main perspectives, one industrial and the other centered on public goods [5]

  • Since the results of the assessment of each category have been normalized, they are presented as percentages: 100% represents the greatest impact obtained for the categories considered as negative environmental effects of production systems

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Climate change is challenging the current models of economic development based on fossil resources, and expectations of growth of the world population indicate that there will be a greater pressure on natural resources necessary for human well-being [1]. The concept of bioeconomics is discussed from two main perspectives, one industrial and the other centered on public goods [5]. Forests 2020, 11, 723 production of renewable biological resources and their conversion into food, bio-based products and bioenergy, as well as related public goods [6]. This economy includes agriculture, forestry, fishing, food, paper and cellulose industries, and part of the chemical, energy and biotechnology industries [6]. In a complementary and somewhat paradoxical way, there is concern with a more sustainable use of scarce natural resources and the conservation of ecosystem services, which are public goods that must be protected by the adoption of more efficient production methods [5]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call