Abstract

Abstract Heterotrophic protists are essential components of the marine ecosystem, yet they are often excluded from monitoring programmes. With limited resources, monitoring strategies need to be optimised considering both scientific knowledge and available resources. In doing so, it is crucial to understand how sampling frequency affects the value of the data. We analysed 11 years of weekly heterotrophic protist time-series data from Station L4 in the Western English Channel to explore how different sampling intervals impact data quality. In the L4 dataset, comprising 55 protist taxa, the reduction of sampling frequency from weekly to four times a year at specific seasons decreased the number of taxa encountered by 38% for ciliates and 29% for heterotrophic dinoflagellates while the mean annual biomass or its mean variation were not affected. Furthermore, when samples were taken only four times a year, biomass peaks of the ten most important taxa were often missed. The primary motivator for this study was furthering the development of the heterotrophic protist monitoring in temperate and subarctic marine areas, e.g. the Baltic Sea. Based on our findings, we give recommendations on sampling frequency to optimise the value of heterotrophic protist monitoring.

Highlights

  • Plankton communities are sensitive to environmental and other human induced-perturbations in the oceans and as such are good indicators of change

  • In addition to ciliates and heterotrophic dinoflagellates, we investigated choanoflagellates, which were enumerated from the same samples

  • A more frequent sampling scheme is required to assess the changes in seasonal succession of community composition, in biodiversity and in the role of individual taxa in the food web

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Plankton communities are sensitive to environmental and other human induced-perturbations in the oceans and as such are good indicators of change. Heterotrophic microplankton consists of both unicellular (e.g. ciliates, heterotrophic dinoflagellates, radiolarians, foraminiferans and other amoebae) and multicellular organisms (e.g. rotifers, copepod nauplii, and meroplanktonic larvae of benthic animals) between 20 and 200 μm in size, while heterotrophic nanoplankton are protists 2–20 μm in size (mainly nanoflagellates, and including small-sized ciliates and dinoflagellates) (Sieburth et al, 1978; Sherr et al, 1997). These nano- and micro-sized heterotrophs form an important functional link be-

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call