Abstract

The importance of incorporating break-repair costs and pipe-replacement costs in optimal design of a water distribution network is highlighted and demonstrated with a hypothetical network. Deterioration due to ageing of pipes requires expensive maintenance and causes inconvenience. The number of breaks generally increases exponentially with pipe age and small-diameter pipes are more likely to break than large-diameter pipes. After a certain age, it would be more cost-effective to replace the pipes than to repair them. The optimisation models which do not consider the maintenance costs tend to result in smaller pipe sizes. The proposed model incorporates both the repair cost and the replacement cost in addition to initial cost. The proposed model is demonstrated by applying it to a 2-loop network. Incorporating pipe-break and replacement economics into optimisation leads to slightly larger diameter pipes. The analysis also reveals that consideration of repair / replacement is essential if the pipe breaks cause high economic impact, the pipe-break growth rate increases fast and discount rate is low. For the example network considered, for a typical set of values, the cost benefit is as much as 12.92%. For cases with low breakage rates, incorporating repair / replacement has been found to make no practical difference. The results show that considering pipe break and pipe replacement in optimisation is important as this could save considerable amounts of money over the lifetime.

Highlights

  • Water distribution systems are subject to deterioration with age

  • Pipe-break analysis needs to be considered during the design of the water distribution system, to be realistic

  • The initial cost is more than $1.102 m. This Optimisation results with pipe replacement shows that when break economics is considered in optimisation, generally larger pipes are selected

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Water distribution systems are subject to deterioration with age. The design procedures of distribution systems should consider the future scenarios too. Goulter and Bouchart (1990) presented methodology for incorporating reliability measure in least cost optimal design of water distribution network in which pipe-break rates for diameters ranging between 25 mm and 610 mm are considered. They assumed an average break rate of 1.55 breaks/yr·km for a 25 mm diameter pipe. Id(j) is the installation cost per unit length for the link j with diameter d(j) to include pipe-break and replacement economics in the optimal design of water distribution. The initial cost is more than $1.102 m This Optimisation results with pipe replacement shows that when break economics is considered in optimisation, generally larger pipes are selected. Cr is taken as cost of pipe and installation (given in Table 3) multiplied by

Similarly Cb is the cost to repair a break
Findings
Summary and conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call