Abstract

Plasma-activated water (PAW) is a useful tool for producing pathogen-free seed fish. This study aimed to apply dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma to reduce the microbial population in the water of a recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) for Nile tilapia larval culture. Initially, a PAW system prototype was developed and found to effectively reduce bacterial populations in both stagnant and circulating water. Additionally, a slight increase in water temperature was observed in the circulating water. Subsequently, the optimisation of PAW conditions in the circulating water was performed. The PAW system, with a copper anode distance of 2 cm and a 1 cm distance between the copper tip and the water surface, combined with a non-spaced cathode pad, exhibited the highest bactericidal effect. Using the optimised PAW conditions, for Experiment I, Nile tilapia larval culture was established in the RAS, supplemented with a bacterial suspension (Bacillus subtilis, Streptococcus agalactiae and Aeromonas hydrophila) to assess the bactericidal effects. Three treatments were applied: 1) control (no PAW or antibiotics), 2) PAW, and 3) antibiotic treatment for Nile tilapia larvae cultured in the RAS system for 672 h. The results demonstrated that both PAW and antibiotic treatments significantly reduced the bacterial populations in the water in relation to the control (P < 0.05). Moreover, a substantial reduction in bacterial population was observed in the whole body of the fingerlings in both the PAW and antibiotic groups in relation to the control fingerlings (P < 0.05). In Experiment II, Nile tilapia larval culture in the RAS was conducted under three different conditions: 1) control (no PAW or antibiotic), 2) PAW, and 3) antibiotic treatment, to evaluate the antimicrobial effects of PAW on waterborne bacterial populations for 672 h. Similar to Experiment I, both antibiotic and plasma treatments significantly reduced the bacterial populations in the water and whole-body fingerlings in relation to the control (P < 0.05). Notably, the growth performance and whole-body composition (moisture, crude protein, crude fat, and ash) of the fingerling fish appeared comparable among the experimental groups (P > 0.05), suggesting that PAW had no detrimental effects on long-term fish culture. Therefore, PAW can be employed to effectively reduce bacterial populations in water, thus minimising bacteria-related issues in fish without adverse impacts on fish growth.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.