Abstract
BackgroundThe proposed waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) cut-off of 0.5 is less optimal for cardiometabolic risk screening in children in many settings. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal WHtR for children from South Africa, and investigate variations by gender, ethnicity and residence in the achieved value.MethodsMetabolic syndrome (MetS) components were measured in 1272 randomly selected learners, aged 10–16 years, comprising of 446 black Africans, 696 mixed-ancestry and 130 Caucasians. The Youden’s index and the closest-top-left (CTL) point approaches were used to derive WHtR cut-offs for diagnosing any two MetS components, excluding the waist circumference.ResultsThe two approaches yielded similar cut-off in girls, 0.465 (sensitivity 50.0, specificity 69.5), but two different values in boys, 0.455 (42.9, 88.4) and 0.425 (60.3, 67.7) based on the Youden’s index and the CTL point, respectively. Furthermore, WHtR cut-off values derived differed substantially amongst the regions and ethnic groups investigated, whereby the highest cut-off was observed in semi-rural and white children, respectively, Youden’s index0.505 (31.6, 87.1) and CTL point 0.475 (44.4, 75.9).ConclusionThe WHtR cut-off of 0.5 is less accurate for screening cardiovascular risk in South African children. The optimal value in this setting is likely gender and ethnicity-specific and sensitive to urbanization.
Highlights
The global burden of higher-than-optimal weight is both significant and rising, with most of the increase reported over the last decade
We have previously reported a high prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in obese and overweight children from South Africa [3]
ABSI, A Body Shape Index; area under the curve (AUC), area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve; Body mass index (BMI), body mass index; Hip, hip circumference; WC, waist circumference; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio; WHtR, waist-to-height ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071133.t002
Summary
The global burden of higher-than-optimal weight is both significant and rising, with most of the increase reported over the last decade. We have previously reported a high prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in obese and overweight children from South Africa [3]. The waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) has been proposed as an alternative to waist circumference for the assessment of central obesity when defining the metabolic syndrome (MetS) [6,7]. The suggestion that WHtR cut-off may be similar in men and women makes it attractive for the quantification of central obesity in children which otherwise, could be very complex when using age-sex-race specific charts. In the present study we aimed to determine the WHtR cut-off for children from South Africa, using the presence of at least 2 components of MetS other than WC as an outcome. The proposed waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) cut-off of 0.5 is less optimal for cardiometabolic risk screening in children in many settings. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal WHtR for children from South Africa, and investigate variations by gender, ethnicity and residence in the achieved value
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
