Optimal use of procalcitonin to rule out bacteremia in patients with possible viral infections.

Abstract

ObjectiveDuring the winter, many patients present with suspected infection that could be a viral or a bacterial (co)infection. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the optimal use of procalcitonin (PCT) is different in patients with and without proven viral infections for the purpose of excluding bacteremia. We hypothesize that when a viral infection is confirmed, this lowers the probability of bacteremia and, therefore, influences the appropriate cutoff of procalcitonin.MethodsThis study was conducted in the emergency department of an academic medical center in The Netherlands in the winter seasons of 2019 and 2020. Adults (>18 years) with suspected infection, in whom a blood culture and a rapid polymerase chain reaction test for influenza was performed were included.ResultsA total of 546 patients were included of whom 47 (8.6%) had a positive blood culture. PCT had an area under the curve of 0.85, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.80–0.91, for prediction of bacteremia. In patients with a proven viral infection (N = 212) PCT < 0.5 μg/L had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 63.1–100) and specificity of 81.2% (95% CI 75.1–86.3) to exclude bacteremia. In patients without a viral infection, the procalcitonin cutoff point of < 0.25 μg/L showed a sensitivity of 87.2% (95% CI 72.6–95.7) and specificity of 64.1 % (95% CI 58.3–69.6).ConclusionIn patients with a viral infection, our findings suggest that a PCT concentration of <0.50 μg/L makes bacteremia unlikely. However, this finding needs to be confirmed in a larger population of patients with viral infections, especially because the rate of coinfection in our cohort was low.