Abstract

Identifying the optimal fremanezumab treatment strategy is crucial in treating patients with migraines. The optimal strategy was investigated by assessing the cumulative 50% reduction rate (50%CRR), cumulative 75% reduction rate (75%CRR), reduction in the number of migraine days, treatment-related adverse events, and serious adverse events in patients treated with fremanezumab 225 mg monthly (225 mg), 675 mg monthly (675 mg), 900 mg monthly (900 mg), a single high dose of 675 mg (S675mg), 675 mg at baseline with 225 mg monthly (675/225 mg), and placebo. Biomedical databases were searched for randomized controlled trials on this topic, and data were individually extracted. Risk ratios and mean differences were used to present the pooled results. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to determine the effects of the medication strategies of fremanezumab. Five trials (n = 3404) were used to form a six-node network meta-analysis. All fremanezumab medication strategies displayed significantly higher cumulative 50% reduction rates than the placebo. The SUCRA revealed that treatment with 675 mg yielded the highest 50%CRR value (mean rank = 2.5). S675 mg was the only treatment with significantly higher 75%CRR reduction rate than placebo, whereas the SUCRA for 225 mg displayed the highest mean rank (2.2). Moreover, 225 mg (mean rank = 2.2) and S675 mg (mean rank = 2.2) presented lower probabilities of serious adverse events. Collectively, S675mg and 225 mg exhibited the optimal balance between efficacy and safety within three months. Long-term efficacy and safety remain unclear, and future studies should further evaluate the long-term outcomes.

Highlights

  • Identifying the optimal fremanezumab treatment strategy is crucial in treating patients with migraines

  • Abbreviations 50%CRR Cumulative 50% reduction rate 75%CRR Cumulative 75% reduction rate Anti-CGRP Anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide CI Confidence intervals MD Mean difference randomized controlled trials (RCTs) Randomized clinical trial RR Risk ratio single high dose of 675 mg (S675mg) Single high dose of 675 mg surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) Surface under the cumulative ranking

  • All fremanezumab medication strategies displayed significantly higher 50% reduction rates than placebo treatments

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Identifying the optimal fremanezumab treatment strategy is crucial in treating patients with migraines. The optimal strategy was investigated by assessing the cumulative 50% reduction rate (50%CRR), cumulative 75% reduction rate (75%CRR), reduction in the number of migraine days, treatment-related adverse events, and serious adverse events in patients treated with fremanezumab 225 mg monthly (225 mg), 675 mg monthly (675 mg), 900 mg monthly (900 mg), a single high dose of 675 mg (S675mg), 675 mg at baseline with 225 mg monthly (675/225 mg), and placebo. Abbreviations 50%CRR Cumulative 50% reduction rate 75%CRR Cumulative 75% reduction rate Anti-CGRP Anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide CI Confidence intervals MD Mean difference RCT Randomized clinical trial RR Risk ratio S675mg Single high dose of 675 mg SUCRA Surface under the cumulative ranking gmail.com. In our previous systematic review and meta-analysis, we evidenced that treatment with anti-CGRP antibodies significantly improved the response rate compared with placebo, in terms of the reduction in the number of migraine days, with a slightly decreasing trend observed during the 3-month treatment i­nterval[16]. The optimal treatment strategy of fremanezumab in treating patients with migraine should be identified to improve migraine management in clinical p­ ractice[20]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.