Abstract
We examine current recommendations for the timing of umbilical cord clamping in term and preterm infants and review available literature in support of these recommendations. Additionally, we explore potential barriers to practice change and identify opportunities for ongoing research. Available literature supports the practice of delayed cord clamping (DCC) in neonates, with clear benefits over immediate cord clamping (ICC) when comparing both short- and longer-term outcomes. Additional studies suggest similar benefits may be conferred by the practice of umbilical cord milking (UCM). Despite recommendation updates, significant variability in practice surrounding the timing of umbilical cord clamping persists. DCC and UCM show definite advantages over ICC. Perceived risks associated with either practice may lead to decreased adherence to current practice recommendations. Additional studies comparing these two practices are warranted and might help to further delineate best practice guidelines or potentially identify populations better suited to one method vs the other. Further education regarding the benefits of DCC and UCM are needed to improve recommendation adherence.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
