Abstract

The present study introduces the concept of ecological cost of heating modeled on the economic cost of heating. A method of determining these costs is also proposed. This method allows for an analytical description of the ecological as well as economic net present value of a thermal insulation investment. Consequently, it is possible to determine the optimal values for ecological reasons of the heat transfer coefficient of the building external wall and the thickness of thermal insulation. The present study uses life-cycle assessment (LCA) analysis to determine the environmental impact of thermal insulation materials used to insulate the external vertical wall and to determine the environmental impact of thermal energy production in the energy phase of the building’s life cycle. Various variants characteristic of Polish conditions were studied. Different types of construction materials of the wall, types of heat sources, thermal insulation materials and climate zones occurring in Poland were considered. For all analysed variants, the obtained thermal insulation thickness, optimum for ecological reasons, was much larger than the optimum for economic reasons. Even at the thickness of thermal insulation optimum for economic reasons, the investment was profitable for ecological reasons, i.e., a reduction in environmental load was obtained as a result of the thermal insulation investment. On the basis of the conducted study, it can be concluded that it is preferable to use thermal insulation thicknesses larger than required by current regulations and larger than optimum for economic reasons. The ecological benefits of thermal insulation investments are then significantly greater, with not much smaller economic benefits.

Highlights

  • It is very important to study the possibilities of reducing buildings’ energy demand [1,2,3,4]

  • It is possible to determine the optimal thickness of thermal insulation for economic reasons, i.e., the one at which the highest net present value (NPV) of investment is obtained

  • An exemplary single-family, two-story residential building and a partial basement, intended for a family of 4–6 people, with usable area of pu = 140.20 m2, surface of external vertical walls p = 206.61 m2 and volume of 376.14 m3 was accepted for the analysis [10]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is very important to study the possibilities of reducing buildings’ energy demand [1,2,3,4]. Thermal insulation investments are evaluated in terms of economic benefits. They can and should be assessed in ecological terms. In the literature on the subject, it is possible to find a lot of articles that develop methods for assessing thermal insulation in economic terms. They are usually based on information on the so-called degree-days of the heating period. It is possible to determine the optimal thickness of thermal insulation for economic reasons, i.e., the one at which the highest net present value (NPV) of investment is obtained (see, for example [5,6,7,8])

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call