Abstract

Conventional models of data envelopment analysis (DEA) are based on the constant and variable returns-to-scale production technologies. Any optimal input and output weights of the multiplier DEA models based on these technologies are interpreted as being the most favorable for the decision making unit (DMU) under the assessment when the latter is benchmarked against the set of all observed DMUs. In this paper we consider a very large class of DEA models based on arbitrary polyhedral technologies, which includes almost all known convex DEA models. We highlight the fact that the conventional interpretation of the optimal input and output weights in such models is generally incorrect, which raises a question about the meaning of multiplier models. We address this question and prove that the optimal solutions of such models show the DMU under the assessment in the best light in comparison to the entire technology, but not necessarily in comparison to the set of observed DMUs. This result allows a clear and meaningful interpretation of the optimal solutions of multiplier models, including known models with a complex constraint structure whose interpretation has been problematic and left unaddressed in the existing literature.

Highlights

  • The two conventional models of data envelopment analysis (DEA) are based on the assumption that the production technology is characterized by either constant or variable returns to scale (CRS and VRS), respectively

  • Complexity of their statements, the optimal solutions of the multiplier model based on any polyhedral technology, including the hybrid returns-to-scale (HRS) technology, are the most favorable for decision making unit (DMU) (Xo, Yo) when it is compared not to the finite set of observed DMUs but to the infinite set of all DMUs in the technology. (We further illustrate the difference between the two interpretations using an example in Section 8.) This new universal interpretation cannot be observed from the standard multiplier model such as (2), and we need to develop alternative multiplier statements that make this new interpretation clear

  • A clear and rigorous interpretation of optimal input and output weights is important for explaining the meaning of multiplier DEA models and the efficiency of DMUs obtained from them

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The two conventional models of data envelopment analysis (DEA) are based on the assumption that the production technology is characterized by either constant or variable returns to scale (CRS and VRS), respectively. In Appendix B, we show the usefulness of our results for the interpretation of multiplier models based on three different polyhedral technologies

Motivational example
Polyhedral technologies
Envelopment and multiplier DEA models
Restated linear program
The general case
À um0 ax
Cone technologies
The hierarchy of multiplier DEA models
Further interpretations
The linear fractional model: the general case
The maximin model: the general case
Interpretations for cone technologies
The special case of VRS and CRS technologies
The CRS technology
Benchmarking DMUo against the set of observed DMUs
Clarifying example
Technology
The multiplier models and their solutions
Benchmarking efficiency ratio against the observed DMUs only
Benchmarking efficiency ratio against the NIRS technology
Benchmarking profit efficiency against the NIRS technology
Summary and discussion
Conclusion
Compliance with ethical standards
10 Appendix A
11 Appendix B
11.2 A two-stage network technology
11.3 Technologies with bounded measures
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.