Abstract
SummarySegment routing (SR) is a source routing paradigm where packet forwarding is based on a sequence of instructions known as segments identified using segment IDs (SIDs). An ordered list of SIDs identifies the source route and is carried in the packet headers. Switches in such networks use the SIDs to look up their forwarding tables and forward packets along the segments. Since various flows can share the segments, SR is a mechanism to avoid per‐flow state thereby minimizing the forwarding table size (FTS) of the switches. Software‐defined networks (SDNs) are suitable for SR since the source routing can be accomplished by a centralized controller. Typically, the segment list is limited to a maximum segment list depth (SLD). It can be shown that FTS varies inversely as the SLD. This paper studies the problem of minimizing the FTS given the set of flows and the SLD limitation, which is shown to be NP‐complete. An ILP formulation of the problem is used to solve the problem in relatively small networks. Two different heuristic solutions, BFH and CCH, are presented to solve this problem in large‐scale networks with up to 30,000 nodes and 250,000 flows and for three different network topologies (ring‐of‐rings, fat‐tree, and mesh). The heuristics are shown to perform up to 50% better than an existing FTS minimization technique. Further, CCH is shown to perform better in networks with a high prevalence of equal cost multipaths (ECMPs), while BFH performs better when ECMPs are few in number.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.